The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Xii v. Paramount Properties

1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City XII, Mumbai ... Appellant v/s Paramount Properties, Mumbai 400 021 ... Respondent Mr Arvind Pinto for Appellant.

None for Respondent.

CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.

DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2016 P.C.:- 1.

This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 1994-95. Mr Pinto, learned counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal as indicated in para 10 of the Appeal Memo is Rs.5,64,256/-. He further states that in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10th December 2015, the tax effect being less than the threshold limits provided therein for challenging an order of the Tribunal before this Court, he does not VRD

2/2 press the present appeal.

2.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) VRD