The Board Of Trustees Of The Port Of Mumbai v. M.T.Royal Diamond 7 And 2 Others

30.chscd.88.2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ADMIRALTY AND VICE-ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 88 OF 2018 IN ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 8 OF 2015 (CONVERTED INTO COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 99 OF 2015) The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay .. Applicants In the matter between :

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay .. Plaintiffs Vs.

M.T. ROYAL DIAMOND & Ors.

.. Defendants Ms. Preeti Shah a/w. Mr. Manoj Thakur i/b M/s. Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe for applicants/plaintiffs. None for defendants.

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 18TH APRIL 2018 P.C.

Ms.Shah appearing for applicants/plaintiffs states that copy of this chamber summons has been served upon the proposed defendants. Ms. Shah states that since defendant No.2 is in liquidation, proposed defendants, who are similar to the official liquidator, has to be brought on record. An affidavit of one Ram Thakur affirmed on 10th April 2018 is on record confirming service. It appears that service on was effected on 21st February 2018.

Shraddha Talekar PS 1/2

30.chscd.88.2018.doc For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out and amended plaint to be served within four weeks.

Chamber summons disposed accordingly.

The suit be listed for directions on 8th June 2018. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Shraddha Talekar PS 2/2