← Library
Bombay High CourtNMT/47/2018disposed off

Girish Jethalal Rathod v. Mahesh Jethalal Rathod And 2 ORS

2018-04-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

908-NMT47-18.DOC Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 47 OF 2018 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 47 OF 2016 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1289 OF 2012 Mahesh J Rathod ...Applicant

Versus

Girish J Rathod & Ors

...Respondents

Mrs Rajashree Nair, for the Applicant.

Mr Ashish A Dubey, for the Plaintiff / Respondent No.1. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

24th April 2018 PC:- 1.

This is an application by the original Defendant Mr Mahesh J Rathod. He says that the original Plaintiff is trying to dispose of a flat that is part of the estate of the deceased Smt Danibai J Rathod. To this Notice of Motion the cooperative society is joined as 3rd Respondent and a builder firm is joined as 2nd Respondent. There is an order of 23rd March 2016 by which the Plaintiff in the Testamentary Suit agreed to revocation of Letters of Administration with Will annexed that he had obtained. The order passed on that 24th April 2018

908-NMT47-18.DOC date (pages 44 to 45) includes an injunction in prayer clause (b) from dealing with this very flat no.D-1/4, Navjagruti Cooperative Housing Society Ltd, Subhash Nagar, Teen Dongri, Goregaon (West), Mumbai 400 090.

2.

Mr Dubey on behalf of Plaintiff states that the Plaintiff is in occupation of this flat and that he has instructions to state that the Plaintiff is not transacting that flat with any person. All that has happened is that the building has been redeveloped and a new flat has been allotted in lieu of the old flat or room No D-1/4. The statement is noted. The injunction is of course continuing and Mr Dubey states that his client is bound and will continue to be bound by it and will abide by it. That is accepted as an undertaking to the Court.

3.

Beyond this no orders are required in the Notice of Motion and which is disposed in these terms. No orders as to costs. 4.

In any case the society, the 3rd Respondent, is directed not to accept any application for transfer of the newly allotted flat without a specific order of the Court. Liberty to the parties to apply. (G. S. PATEL, J) 24th April 2018