← Library
Bombay High CourtITR/137/1998disposed off

The C.I.T.B.C.Iv. v. Lallubhai Nagardas And Sons

2016-04-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

137-98-ITR=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 137 OF 1998 The C.I.T. Bombay City-IV, Bombay .. Applicant v/s.

Lallubhai Nagardas & Sons, Bombay .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.M. BADAR, J.J.

DATED : 29th APRIL, 2016.

P.C.

1.

This Reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relates to Assessment Year 1983-84.

2.

Our attention is invited to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10th December, 2015 which directs the Revenue not to challenge order of the Tribunal before this Court where the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs and where appeals have been filed, the same should either be not pressed or withdrawn. Mr. Pinto, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, on instruction, states that the tax effect involved in the present Reference is less than the threshold limit of Rs.20 lakhs.

3.

Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue points out that although the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10th Uday S. Jagtap

137-98-ITR=.doc December, 2015 relates to an Appeal under Section 260-A of Act, this Court in CIT v/s. in Sunny Sounds (P) Ltd. (ITR No. 213 of 1997) decided on 8th January, 2016 has taken a view that the above Circular No.21 of 2015 issued by CBDT on 10th December, 2015 would be applicable also to pending References.

4.

In the above view, on instructions, Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue does not press the present Reference. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing the Reference.

5.

Accordingly, the question framed in this Reference, for our opinion, is returned unanswered along with the Reference. However, it is made clear that in an appropriate case, the question as framed herein is left open for consideration.

6.

Accordingly, Reference is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs.

(A.M. BADAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Uday S. Jagtap