Ultratech Cement Limited v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise

3 NMA 494 OF 2016.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.494 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.258 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.496 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.252 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.497 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.257 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.498 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.256 OF 2016 Ultra Tech Cement Limited .... Applicant.

V/s.

The Commissioner of Central Excise Nagpur .... Respondent Mr. Jas Sanghavi I/by M/s PDS Legal, for the Applicant. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, for the Respondent.

CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 2 nd MAY, 2016.

P.C. :

1.

Heard both sides. Perused the Notices of Motion. We have also perused the affidavits in support of these Notices of Motion. The 1/2

3 NMA 494 OF 2016.doc reasons set out therein constitute sufficient cause for condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. The Notices of Motion, are therefore made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] 2/2