The Commissioner Of Central Excise And Service Tax (Ltu) v. M/S. Bajaj Auto Ltd.

Dusane 1/2 69 nma374.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.374 OF 2017 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.230 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Central Excise ....

Applicant & Service Tax (LTU), Mumbai Commissionerate In the matter between The Commissioner of Central Excise ....

Appellant & Service Tax (LTU), Mumbai Commissionerate Vs.

M/s Bajaj Auto Limited ....

Respondent Mr. Swapnil Bangur a/w Mr. Sham V. Walve for the Applicant. Mr. Makrand Joshi for the Respondent.

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 23 JUNE, 2017 PER COURT :

We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondent.

Dusane 2/2 69 nma374.2017 For the reasons stated in the affidavit supporting the Notice of Motion, the Motion is allowed. The delay of 33 days caused in filing the Appeal is condoned. The Motion is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

( G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)