← Library
Bombay High CourtCARBP/535/2019disposed off

Abhishek Enterprises And 2 ORS v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2022-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

1_CARBP532_19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.532 OF 2019 J.K. Computers & Ors.

...

Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.534 OF 2019 S.M. Computers Private Limited & Ors.

...

Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.535 OF 2019 Abhishek Enterprises & Ors.

...

Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.536 OF 2019 S.M. Computers Private Limited & Ors.

...

Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar, Mr.Asadali Mazgaonwala and Ms. Sayli Shinde i/b. Kartikeya and Associates for Petitioners. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP for Respondents.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 08, 2022 P.C. :

.

Dr. Birendra Saraf, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petitions. 2.

Hence, the petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. 3.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in these petitions, one of the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners is that they are 1/2

1_CARBP532_19.doc not liable to pay service tax and it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioners have already instituted appropriate proceedings before the the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

4.

Disposal of these petitions, as withdrawn, will not affect the proceedings so initiated before the CESTAT.

5.

Pending applications, if any, in these petitions are disposed of. (MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2