Vicco Products (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Maharashtra, The Commissioner Of Sales Tax

str80,16,17 ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SALES TAX REFERENCE (L)NO.80 OF 2006 WITH SALES TAX REFERENCE NO.16 OF 2010 WITH SALES TAX REFERENCE NO.17 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/b PDS Legal for the Applicant Mr.Himanshu Takke, AGP for the Respondent.

CORAM : A.S.OKA, & A.K.MENON,JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 7, 2017 P.C.

The learned counsel for the applicant has placed on record a print out of e-mail sent by the Advocate for the applicant to the applicant. On the print out there is a confirmation signed and sealed by the applicant. The same is taken on record and marked `X'

for identification. Reference was made at the instance of the applicant. Now the applicant does not want to press the reference.

Hence, the reference is returned without deciding the same. The issue raised is kept open. Reference be

str80,16,17 treated as disposed of.

(A.K.MENON,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)