Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Roshan Soap Factory

Hindustan Unilever Limited v Roshan Soap Factory 917-sl-72-2017.doc JSN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 72 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 270 OF 2017 Hindustan Unilever Limited ...Plaintiffs

Versus

Roshan Soap Factory ...Defendant Mr. Ashutosh Kane, with Ms Chitra Sundar, i/b W.S. Kane & Co., for the Plaintiffs.

Mr Chunilal Taraji Prajapati, Proprietor of the Defendant present. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

1st March 2017 PC:- 1.

By consent, the Leave Petition is made absolute. 2.

Mr Chunilal Taraji Prajapati, Proprietor of the Defendant, who is personally present in Court, submits to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Mr. Kane, therefore, does not press his prayer for damages.

1st March 2017

Hindustan Unilever Limited v Roshan Soap Factory 917-sl-72-2017.doc 3.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

4.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed after removing the goods from the impugned packaging by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks. The Defendant will file an Affidavit of compliance within a period of sixteen weeks from today. The Defendant may reuse the goods. 5.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

6.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 270 of 2017 does not survive and is disposed accordingly.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 1st March 2017