Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Bhola Gruha Udyog

916-NMSL292-17.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 85 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 292 OF 2017 Hindustan Unilever Ltd ...Plaintiff

Versus

Bhola Ghuha Udyog ...Defendant Mr Ashutosh Kane, a/w Ms Vrinda Gambhir, i/b WS Kane & Co., for the Plaintiff.

Mr Nur Mohammad Arif Kachhi, Proprietor of the Defendant, is present.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

2nd March 2017 PC:- 1.

Mr Nur Mohamad Arif Kachhi, Proprietor of the Defendant, who is personally present in Court, says that the Defendant submits to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Mr. Kane, therefore, does not presses his prayer for damages. 2.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

2nd March 2017

916-NMSL292-17.DOC 3.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks.

4.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

5.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 292 of 2017 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.

6.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 2nd March 2017