Kavita Kiran Pawaskar And ANR. v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And 5 ORS.

by VIDYA SURESH AMIN Date:

2023.03.11 17:27:17 +0530 VIDYA SURESH AMIN 503.IA565_2023.DOC Vidya Amin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 565 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION (l) NO. 18043 OF 2021 Kavita Kiran Pawaskar & Anr.

... Petitioners

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Prerak A. Sharma a/w. Mr. Nihir U. Dedhia, Rushikesh Bhagat for the applicant/petitioner.

Ms. Vandana Mahadik for respondent/MCGM.

Mr. Kevin Pereira i/b. Chinmay Achary for respondent no. 5. _______________________

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & R.N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATED:

09 March, 2023 _______________________ P.C.

1.

Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board on a praecipe as moved on behalf of the petitioners.

2.

By this Application, the applicants/petitioners pray to amend the Writ Petition to implead the State of Maharashtra as a party-respondent. 3.

Having perused the memo of the application, we are of the opinion that the application ought to be allowed. The application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The petition be amended within one week from today and copy of the amended petition be served on all the respondents. 9 March, 2023

503.IA565_2023.DOC 4.

The added respondent as also the respondents to the petition shall file their respective affidavit, if not already filed. 5.

Parties are put to notice that on the adjourned date of hearing, an endeavour would be made to hear the parties and pass appropriate orders. (R.N. LADDHA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) 9 March, 2023