Larsen And Toubro Infotech Ltd. v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad And ANR.

211-wp-328-2009.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.328 OF 2009 Larsen & Tourbo Infotech Limited, Mumbai

...Petitioner

vs.

The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad and Another

...Respondents

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Shri. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Atul Jasani, for the Petitioner Shri. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents.

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2022.02.05 11:25:42 +0530 CORAM :

K.R. SHRIRAM & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 03, 2022 P.C.:

.

Shri Suresh Kumar on instructions states that since the assessment in Hyderabad is completed, Court may grant prayer clause (a).

2.

Accordingly, prayer clause (a) which reads as under, is granted.

(a) This Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the Petitioner's case and after examining the legality and validity thereof quash and set aside the notice dated 23rd December, 2008 and 21st January, 2009 being Exhibit A and C hereto, issued by Respondent No. 1 purportedly under section 133(6) of the Act and also the notice and summons both dated 2nd March, 2009 Vishal Parekar 1/2

211-wp-328-2009.doc being Exhibit F and G issued by Respondent No. 3 purportedly under section 131of the Act calling for certain information and also set aside the notice dated 4th February, 2009 being Exhibit E hereto, issued under section 272A of the Act for imposition of penalty under that section for alleged non-compliance of notices issued under section 133(6) of the Act.

3.

Petition disposed.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2