The Commissioner Of Incom E-Tax v. Shri Amitabh Bachchan

901. ITXA 253.03.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai ... Petitioner V/s.

Amitabh Bachchan ... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w. Ms. Krunali Satra for the Petitioner Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. PDS Legal for the Respondent CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 10 JUNE 2022 P.C. :- Appeal had come up on board yesterday and was adjourned at the joint request, for the Appellant to take instructions since the learned Counsel for the Respondent had pointed out that the Respondent had applied under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, made the requisite payment but because of the pendency of this Appeal final form has not yet been issued. The learned Counsel for the Appellant accepts the position that the Appeal would not survive.

901. ITXA 253.03.doc 2.

The Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

3.

The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that in case exigency arises regarding payment in future, liberty may be granted to revive the Appeal. Liberty as prayed for is granted. N.R. BORKAR, J.

NITIN JAMDAR, J.

by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date:

2022.06.15 11:56:19 +0530 JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR