← Library
Bombay High CourtRP/47/2015disposed off

Sundeep Jugalkishore Gupta v. Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali Huf And 3 ORS.

2015-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla2 pages

Nitin 1 / 2 964-NMS-1510-2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURSIDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 11 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 1678 OF 1987 Sundeep J. Gupta ...

Petitioner

Versus

1. Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali HUF & Or. ... Respondents Ms. Shreema Doshi i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Company for the Petitioner.

Mr. U. Kazi i/b. Divya Shah for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATED : 30 TH JUNE, 2015 P.C.:

1.

The above Suit was originally filed against Defendant No. 1 - Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali HUF. The original Defendant No. 2 was Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali. The Defendant No. 3 was the wife of Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali. The Defendant No. 4 was the son of Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali. Since the Defendant No. 2 expired, Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 were also shown as Defendant Nos. 2A and 2B being legal heirs of the original Defendant No. 2. Thereafter, Defendant No. 3 / 2A also expired. In view thereof, only the Defendants to the Suit are Defendant No. 1 HUF and Defendant No. 4 / 2B. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner / Original Plaintiff as well as the

Nitin 2 / 2 964-NMS-1510-2007 Respondents / original Defendants agree that the Suit is now surviving against Defendant No. 1 HUF and Defendant No. 4 / 2B. In view of this clarification, the Review Petition stands disposed of. (S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)