Hari Arjandas Panjwani v. Ashok T. Hemdeo, Being C.A. Of Radhakrishin S. Gulabani (Def) And Renu Wd/O Hari A Panjwani And 2 O

cst39.17-39

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.39 OF 2017 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.52 OF 2013 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.268 OF 2009 Renu wd/o Hari A.Panjwani & Ors.

)...Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Hari Arjandas Panjwani )....Plaintiff V/s.

Radhakrishin s/o Sujandas Gulabani )....Defendant ---- Mr.Clifford Martis for the applicants.

None for the defendant.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 29.3.2017 P.C.:- This chamber summons is to bring the legal heirs of the plaintiff on record. It is stated in the affidavit in support that the plaintiff expired on 14.11.2016 and the chamber summons has been lodged on 13.2.2017, within the 90 days' period. The counsel appearing for the applicants states that the defendant has also expired and the caveat was filed through a Constituted Attorney. The counsel also states that the defendant's legal heirs have been served the chamber summons. Statement accepted. The counsel states that he will file affidavit of service within two weeks from today. KJ

cst39.17-39 For reasons mentioned in affidavit-in-support, Chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause-(a). Amendment to be carried out and amended petition to be served on the legal heirs within three weeks.

Chamber summons disposed.

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J) KJ