Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Chamunda Chemical Works

923-NMSL372-17.DOC SHEPHALI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION(L) NO. 372 OF 2017 IN SUIT (L) NO. 107 OF 2017 WITH LEAVE PETITION NO. 63 OF 2017 Hindustan Unilever Limited ... Applicants In the matter between Hindustan Unilever Limited ... Plaintiffs

Versus

Chamunda Chemical Works ... Defendants Mr Nikhil Sharma, a/w Ms Vrinda Gambhir, i/b WS Kane & Co for the Plaintiffs.

Mr Prajapati Dineshbhai Chimanbhai,Proprietor of the Defendant, present.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

15th March 2017 PC:- 1.

By consent, the Petition for leave under Clause XIV is made absolute.

2.

Mr Prajapati Dineshbhai Chimanbhai, Proprietor of the Defendant is personally present in Court, says the Defendant 15th March 2017

923-NMSL372-17.DOC submits to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (e) of the Suit.

3.

Mr Sharma, therefore, does not presses his prayer for damages.

4.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

5.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks.

6.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

7.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 372 of 2017 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.

8.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 15th March 2017