A.J. Pinto v. Zahra Developers And 2 ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO. 2608 OF 2010 Shakuntala N. Raut ...

Petitioner vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 22 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO. 3162 OF 2010 Shakuntala N. Raut & Anr.

...

Petitioners vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO. 2645 OF 2010 Sunanda R. Shetty ...

Petitioner vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO. 2642 OF 2010 Rossi M. D'souza ...

Petitioner vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 25 OF 2013 RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI IN SUIT NO. 2643 OF 2010 RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2021.11.18 17:49:53 +0530 1/3

Salima Sathar ...

Petitioner vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 26 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO. 2609 OF 2010 Anthony J. Pinto ...

Petitioner vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO. 2644 OF 2010 Laxmi M. Pujari ...

Petitioner vs.

Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.

... Respondents Ms. Sarika Mehta i/b. L.J. Law for the Petitioners. Mr. Yash Tiwari i/b. M/s. K. P. Tiwari & Co. for Respondent nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.

th NOVEMBER, 2021 DATED : 17 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that she has instructions to proceed in execution of the decree passed in terms of the consent terms and that she has instructions to withdraw these contempt petitions. She states that she will proceed in execution of the decrees in terms of the consent terms. In 2/3

view thereof I pass the following order:

(i) Contempt Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn in view of the applicants intention of proceeding in execution. (ii) Petitions are disposed in the above terms.

(A. K. MENON, J.) 3/3