Sunil Babani H.U.F. v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And 53 ORS. And Sunny Manoj Patel And 2 Others (Applicant)

chswl-49.15 pmw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS (L.) NO.49 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3093 OF 2014 Sunny Manoj Patel and Ors.

... Applicants In the matter between Sunil Babani H.U.F., ... Petitioner Through its Karta Mr. Sunil Babani Vs.

Municipal Corporation of Greater of Mumbai and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Vijay Waghela, for the Applicants.

Mr. Birendra Saraf a/w Mr. Chirag Modi i/by Mr. Dushyant Purekar, for Petitioner in WP/3093 of 2014.

Mr. N.V. Gangal for the Respondent Nos.2 to 42. Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondent - BMC.

Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Senior Counsel i/b Mr. Anil D'Souza, for Respondent No.43.

Mr. Mrugank Shah, for Respondent No.44 to 52. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 8th APRIL, 2015 P.C.

.

The learned counsel representing the parties to the consent terms filed in the Writ Petition state that the Applicants are not bound by the consent terms and the consent order passed in the Writ Petition. We accept the said statement.

2.

The Applicants are not parties to the Writ Petition and to the consent terms. Therefore, even otherwise, the consent terms and the consent order will not bind them. Subject to what is observed above, the Chamber Summons is disposed of.

(A.P. BHANGALE, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )