Indrani Pillay v. The Trustees Of The Uco Bank Employees Provident Fund And 2 ORS

903-NMW.94.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Digitally signed by Jayant Vishwanath Salunke Date:

2018.10.03 11:08:46 +0530 Jayant Vishwanath Salunke NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 94 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 5 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2258 OF 2013 Indrani Pillay } Applicant in the matter of Indrani Pillay } Petitioner versus The Trustees of the UCO Bank } Employees Provident Fund } and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. Laxman Venkatesan for the applicant.

Mr. Vishal Khanavkar for the respondent.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE :- SEPTEMBER, 28, 2018 P.C. :- Having heard both sides, we are of the view that there is a sufficient cause shown for the delay in filing the review petition. That is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would be no order as to costs. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA