Bal Asha Trust v. Vinodkumar Sateesh Aigal And ANR. (Prospective Adoptive Parents) And Vismita V. Aigal (Minor)
1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION AND IN ITS GENERAL AND INHERENT JURISDICTION INDIAN ADOPTION PETITION NO.28 OF 2021 WITH JUDGE'S ORDER NO.45 OF 2021 Bal Asha Trust ...
Petitioner
Versus
Vinodkumar Sateesh Aigal Roopashree Ramachandra Goankar ...
Prospective Adoptive Parents .....
Mr. Rakesh K.L. Kapoor for the Petitioner.
Mr. O. Hareendran, Security Officer, Indian Council of Social Welfare, present.
.....
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
(IN CHAMBERS) DATE : 30 APRIL 2021 P.C. :
.
Heard Mr. Kapoor, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, and Mr. Hareendran, Scrutiny Officer, Indian Council of Social Welfare (ICWS), in the Chambers through a VC hearing. The petition proposes adoption of a female minor child by the name of Kareena, born on 22 June 2020. The child was surrendered
2/4 by the biological mother before the Child Welfare Committee, Mumbai City-II on 26 June 2020. The 'legally free for adoption' order was passed by the Child Welfare Committee, Mumbai City-I after inquiry under Section 38 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 ("Act") on 28 August 2020. The same is placed on record. The proposed adoptive parents are Indian nationals residing at Uttara Kannada, Karnataka. They are aged about 40 and 35 years, respectively, having been married for the past 9 years with no biological child. The motivation letter of the proposed adopters has been placed on record. The letter inter alia claims that despite having been married for the past nine years, they have not been blessed with a biological child and hence, their decision to adopt the child.
The decision of the Adoption Committee meeting held on 15 December 2020 and 21 December 2020 has also been placed on record inter alia approving the prospective adoptive parents for the referral for the minor child. An affidavit by the Chief Functionary of the Specialized Adoption Agency, that is, the Petitioner herein, has also been placed on record.
The prospective adoptive father has been working a Senior Clerk with U.K. Souharda Credit Co-operative Limited, Yellapur since last 14 years with a monthly gross salary of Rs.18,550/-, whilst the prospective adoptive mother has been working as a Computer Operator with Shree Mahabaleshwara Enerprises, Dist. Uttar Kannada
3/4 and her monthly gross salary is Rs.13,600/-. Financial documents, such as salary slips, PAN and AADHAR Cards and income tax returns, have been placed on record together with proof of residence and other supportive documents.
Medical reports of the adoptive parents showing that they are in good health for adopting the child, along with their HIV and other test reports, have also been placed on record. A home study report showing self assessment as well as an assessment report of a social worker of Sahaya, In-Country Adoption Centre, Sirsi, Karnataka has also been placed on record. The report has considered and found them to be suitable for adopting a child. Child security undertaking, furnished by the younger sister and brother-in-law of the adoptive father, both residing at Goa, offering to look after the minor child in case of any mishap to the prospective adoptive parents, has been placed on record.
A medical examination report of the minor, indicating the child to be a normal and healthy infant, which has been countersigned by the prospective parents, has been placed on record, together with declaration of consent and willingness of the prospective adoptive parents. Health certificates, such as negative HIV report, of the minor have been placed on record.
4/4 Considering the material placed on record, some of which has been referred to above, and compliances noted as above, this Court is of the view that the adoption petition deserves to be allowed. The report of the Scrutiny Officer, dated 25 March 2021, is taken on record, marked 'X' for identification.
The petition is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (e).
In accordance with the practice note of this court for Indian adoptions, the prospective adoptive parents have offered to make an investment in the name of the minor child in the sum of Rs.2 lacs and submit a report of such investment.
A separate Judge's Order for appointing the prospective adopters as adoptive parents of the minor Kareena is signed by this Court today.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)