Lalit Ravindra Dongre v. The Commissioner Of Cental Excise

suresh 14-16-NMAG-921.2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.921 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL [L] NO.80 OF 2016 Kishore Vithal Ahire .... Applicant In the matter between Kishore Vithal Ahire .... Appellant Vs.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik .... Respondent AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.922 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL [L] NO.79 OF 2016 Vaishali Vijay Yeola .... Applicant In the matter between Vaishali Vijay Yeola .... Appellant Vs.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik .... Respondent AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.927 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL [L] NO.78 OF 2016 Lalit Ravindra Dongre .... Applicant In the matter between Lalit Ravindra Dongre .... Appellant Vs.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik .... Respondent

suresh 14-16-NMAG-921.2016.doc Mr. Prakash Shah with Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/by M/s. PDS Legal for the Applicant/Appellant in all matters.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Respondent in all matters.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : JULY 18, 2016 P.C:

For the reasons set out in the affidavits in support, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of the delay. Notices of motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs.

(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)