The Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S Prathamesh Constructions

suresh 3&4-NMAG-656.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.656 OF 2017 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL {L} NO.208 OF 2017 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.657 OF 2017 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL {L} NO.206 OF 2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-2 .... Applicant In the matter between The Pr Commissioner of Income-2 .... Appellant Vs.

M/s Prathamesh Constructions .... Respondent Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Girish S. Godbole with Mr. Akshay Petkar & Ms Shruti Tulpule for the Respondent.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 29, 2017 P.C:

1.

Having heard both sides, we find that there is sufficient cause for condonation of the delay, the computation of which, according to the Revenue, is of one day, but according to

suresh 3&4-NMAG-656.2017.doc the assessee, the delay is much more. We do not enter into this controversy or issue as we are otherwise satisfied that there is no negligence or callousness nor any intentional or deliberate act attributable to the applicant/Revenue. The motions are, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs.

2.

The appeals be registered and listed for admission. 3.

Both the motions accordingly stand disposed of. (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)