Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.Nandkishore And Co

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Jayant Vishwanath Salunke INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2016 Jayant Vishwanath Salunke Date: 2018.09.07 12:39:17 +0530 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax } Appellant versus Shri Vijay Sudhakar Khachane } Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 523 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax } Appellant versus M/s. Calibre Chemicals Pvt.Ltd.

} Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 524 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax } Appellant versus Rishiroop Rubber International Ltd. } Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 525 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax } Appellant versus M/s. Nandkishore and Co.

} Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 526 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax } Appellant versus M/s. Sandeep Shrivastava } Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 } Appellant versus NetScout Systems India Pvt. Ltd.

} Respondent

WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax } Appellant versus NetScout Systems India Pvt. Ltd.

} Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellants.

Mr. S. S. Shetty for the respondent in ITXA/523/2016.

Mr. Jitendra Singh for the respondent in ITXA/524/2016.

Ms. Rutuja Pawar I/b. Mr. S. C. Tiwari for the respondent in ITXA/525/2016.

Mr. Aasifa Khan I/b. Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondent in ITXA/526/2016.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE :- SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 P.C. :- 1.

Mr. Suresh Kumar, on instructions, states that the Revenue may be allowed to withdraw these appeals. They are withdrawn in the light of the circular issued by the Revenue which determines the limit of monetary sums or the sum above which alone the appeals of the Revenue are to be pressed. Every appeal involving a sum mentioned below this limit would not be pressed and on the Revenue's request, the court may dismiss it as withdrawn.

2.

We have found that the Revenue is withdrawing the appeals, which are pending admission. It is for the Revenue to decide and withdraw the appeals based on its circular, but we clarify that we have expressed no opinion on the proposed questions of law nor on the legality and validity of the circular. 3.

By clarifying as above, the appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and stand disposed of as such.

(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)