Ramesh Teunram Parasani v. Suresh T. Parasani And Others

1/1 30.NMT-36-2013.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.36 OF 2013 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1088 OF 2012 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.53 OF 2013 Ramesh Teunram Parsani ....Applicant/Plaintiff Vs.

Suresh T. Parsani and Ors.

....Defendants ---- Ms. Bijal Mehta a/w. Ms. Shivani Soni i/b. Deven Dwarkadas and Partner for the applicant/plaintiff.

None for the defendants.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 25th JANUARY, 2017 P.C.:

Ms. Mehta, counsel appearing for the plaintiff states that ad-interim order dated 1st July, 2013 be confirmed as order in the notice of motion.

Have considered the relief as sought in the notice of motion and the order passed on 1st July, 2013. In my view, it will serve the interest of justice if the order dated 1st July, 2013 is confirmed as order in the notice of motion.

Therefore, the order dated 1st July, 2013 is confirmed as order in the notice of motion and the notice of motion accordingly stands disposed.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad