← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2074/2001disposed off

The Great Eastern Shipping Co.Ltd. v. K.C.Neredi,Addl.Commiss. Of I-Tax And ORS.

2021-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar2 pages

1/2 202.1-WP-2074-2001.doc PURTI PRASAD PARAB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2021.12.01 14:53:20 +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2074 OF 2001 The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd.

....Petitioner V/s.

K.C.Naredi, Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range 31, Mumbai and Ors.

...Respondents

---- Mr. P.J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jitendra Jain and Mr. Ronak Desai i/b Rustomji and Ginwala for Petitioner. Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

DATED : 25th NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. :

1.

Rule and Ad-interim relief was granted by an order dated 25th February, 2002. The facts in this case are almost identical to the facts in Writ Petition No.644 of 2001 except that the Assessment Year changes, amounts differ and some of the reasons given for re-opening are different. Otherwise, the facts as well as our findings in Writ Petition No.644 of 2001 will squarely apply in this case as well.

2.

Rule, therefore, is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. For ease of reference prayer clause (a) reads as under :

(a) that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Purti Parab

2/2 202.1-WP-2074-2001.doc Constitution of India calling for the records of the Petitioner' case and after examining the legality and validity thereof to quash and set aside the impugned notice dated 29th March 2001 being Exhibit "G" hereto.

3.

Petition stands disposed.

(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Purti Parab