Anil R. Agarwal And Sudhir R. Agarwal v. Shyam Devi R. Agarwal (Deceased)

Before : Shri A. M. Chandekar Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 15th March, 2018 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL (ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS) :

CHOL/262/2018 TPL/2495/2017 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Mr. Vikas Rajwadkar I/b. Janardan Singh, Advocate for Applicant.

P.C. :

The present Chamber Order is taken out for restoration of Petition, dismissed by Order dated 23.01.2018 under the provision of O.S. Rule 986.

Perused Affidavit in Support. Heard Ld.

Counsel for Applicant. Ld. Counsel for Applicant made statement that captioned Petition is uncontested.

According to the Ld. Counsel for Applicant through oversight and personal difficulty, Petitioner could not remove office objections.

As captioned Petition is uncontested, contention of the Applicant needs to be accepted as sufficient reason. Hence, Chamber Order is granted as prayed and signed separately.

Applicant and/or his Advocate to remove office objections on the Petition and get the same numbered and regd.

on or before 02-04-2018, failing Petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986.

Date : 15.03.2018 Prothonotary & Senior Master