Ramesh S/O. Vitthalrao Bansod v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

Before : Shri A. M. Chandekar Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 28th March, 2018 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL (ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS) : CHOL/259/2018 CONPWL/87/2017 WP/2871/2017 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ms. Madhavi Ayyappan I/b. Talekar and Associates, Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. U. S. Upadhyay, A. G. P, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.

P.C. :

Instant Chamber Order is taken out for setting aside Order dated 31.10.2017, rejecting Petition for non-removal of office objections.

Ld. A.G.P for Respondent No. 1 gave no objection to allow instant Chamber Order. Despite service, none present on behalf of Respondent No. 2.

Perused Affidavit in Support. Heard Ld.

Counsel for Applicants. Affidavit in Support reveals that Ld. Advocate for Applicant was under bonafide belief that there is no objection raised by Office, which required compliance.

As Ld. A. G. P. has given no objection and none appeared on behalf of Respondent No. 2, contention of the Applicant needs to be accepted. Hence, Chamber Order is granted as prayed and signed separately.

Applicants and/or their Advocate to remove office objections on the Petition and get the same numbered and regd.

on or before 25-04-2018, failing Petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986.

Date : 28.03.2018 Prothonotary & Senior Master