The Commissioner Of Service Tax - Vii, Mumbai v. M/S Arpana Automotive Pvt. Ltd.

Dusane 1/2 121 nma895.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.895 OF 2017 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.293 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Service Tax- VII ....

Applicant Mumbai In the matter between The Commissioner of Service Tax- VII ....

Appellant Mumbai Vs.

M/s Arpana Automotive Pvt. Ltd.

....

Respondent Mr. Vipul Bajpayee for the Applicant.

Mr. R.G. Sheth a/w Ms. Pinki D. Chainam for the Respondent. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 23 JUNE, 2017 PER COURT :

We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondent.

Dusane 2/2 121 nma895.2017 Learned counsel for the Respondent opposes the Notice of Motion. The facts stated in the affidavit-in-service of the Notice of Motion stand un-controverted as no affidavit is filed. For the reasons stated in the affidavit supporting the Notice of Motion, the Motion is allowed. The delay of 121 days caused in filing the Appeal is condoned. The Motion is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

( G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)