← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1035/2019

Roshan Rajendra Sethia v. Corporation Bank And 2 ORS.

2019-03-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.A. Sayed,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla1 pages

9-WPL-679-2019.DOC jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.679 OF 2019 Roshan Rajendra Sethia ... Petitioner V/s.

Corporation Bank and Ors.

... Respondents Mr. S.K. Mishra, for the Petitioner.

Ms. Sandhya Nanavare, for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM:

A.A.SAYED & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE:

18TH MARCH, 2019.

PC:- 1.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 - Bank undertakes to file Vakalatnama within a period of one week from today.

2.

The Petitioner claims to be a tenant of the secured asset. The Petitioner has a remedy to challenge the impugned order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate before the DRT. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition. The Petition is dismissed.

( R. I. CHAGLA, J. ) (A.A.SAYED, J.) 1/1