Jayashree Haldankar v. Reserve Bank Worker Organization, Mumbai And ANR.

1.NMW445.2015.DOC Talwalkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 445 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION(L) NO. 10 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1517 OF 2006 Mrs. Jayshree Haldankar.

... Applicant.

Versus

Reserve Bank worker Organisation & ors.

...Respondents.

Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy and Sai Kumar Ramamurthy, Advocate for applicant/Review Petitioner.

Ms. Aditi Pathak a/w Mr. Vijay Solankhe, Ms. Kirti Ojha i/b. BLAC & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 2 Reserve Bank of India.

CORAM:

M.S. SONAK, J.

DATED :

th September 2022 Digitally signed by ARUNA S TALWALKAR Date:

2022.09.16 10:39:32 +0530 ARUNA S TALWALKAR P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. There is delay of about 90 days in instituting the Review Petition. The delay is sufÏciently explained in an afÏdavit in support of the motion. Even otherwise, there are no malafides involved and the applicant has no benefit by delaying the instiution of Review Petition. Hence, the 12th September 2022

1.NMW445.2015.DOC delay is condoned. The Notice of Motion No. 445 of 2015 is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

M. S. SONAK, J.

12th September 2022