All Maharashtra Human Rights Welfare Association v. Mumbai Circket Association And 2 ORS.

2.PIL21_2016.doc Vidya Amin.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 21 OF 2018 All Maharashtra Human Rights Welfare Association ...

Petitioner vs.

Mumbai Cricket Association & Ors.

...

Respondents Ms. Vishakha Pandit i/b. Prashant Jadhav for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar a/w. V.V. Warerkar i/b. Warerkar & Warerkar for respondent no. 1.

Mr. L.T. Satelkar, AGP for respondent/State.

CORAM:

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATED:

17th June, 2019 P.C. :

Filed in public interest, without pleading as to what is the tenure of the Managing Committee of the first respondent, the prayer made is to direct that elections to be held to elect the members of the Managing Committee of the first respondent, and till then to restrain the current members of the Managing Committee from functioning as the managing committee of the first respondent. 2.

The office bearers constituting the Managing Committee of the

2.PIL21_2016.doc first respondent have not been impleaded as respondents. Be that as it may, under an order passed by this Court, the management of the first respondent is vested in an adhoc committee. Further, as per the order dated 14th March, 2019 passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 4235 of 2014, no Court other than the Supreme Court can proceed with any matter pertaining to a State Cricket Association which is a member of B.C.C.I. Thus, relief, as prayed cannot be granted and hence the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed. N.M. JAMDAR, J.

CHIEF JUSTICE