Inorbit Malls (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Inorbit Tours Pvt. Ltd.

905-S-931-2012.DOC JSN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.931 OF 2012 Inorbit Malls (India) Private Limited ... Plaintiff

Versus

Inorbit Tours Private Limited ... Defendant Mr. Amit Thakkar, i/b Khaitan and Company for the Plaintiff. Mr. Mahesh Mahadgut, for the Defendant.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

25th July 2016 PC:- 1.

The Suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the Advocates for the parties, by the Associate VicePresident of the Plaintiff and by a Director of the Defendant, both present in Court.

2.

Being satisfied that the Consent Terms are not contrary to law, that they reflect the true intention of the parties, and have been drawn by the parties of their own volition, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

3.

The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

25th July 2016

905-S-931-2012.DOC 4.

The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms.

5.

Drawn up decree dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

6.

All interim applications are infructuous and are disposed of accordingly.

7.

The Registry will return to the respective parties their original documents upon these being substituted with photocopies duly authenticated by the respective Advocates. 8.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 25th July 2016