Jindal Drugs Pvt.Ltd. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

spb/ 3nmw430-16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 430 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (LDG.) NO. 2552 OF 2015 M/s. Jindal Drugs Pvt. Ltd.

... Applicant.

In the matter between :

M/s. Jindal Drugs Pvt. Ltd.

... Petitioner.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents.

--- Mr. Vijayak Patkar, Advocate a/w. Mr.Ishaan Patkar & Mr.Meet Sawant, i/by Manjiri Parasnis for the Applicant/Org.Petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the Respondent - State. --- CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA And RIYAZ IQBAL CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2018.

PC :

This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 122 days delay in seeking to set-aside the self-operating order dated 20.10.2015 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this court, rejecting the applicant/petitioner's petition under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, for failure to remove office office objections on or before 03.11.2015.

by Shalikram Pralhadrao Borey Date: 2018.09.11 18:38:40 +0530 Shalikram Pralhadrao Borey Borey 1/2

spb/ 3nmw430-16.odt An affidavit by Mr. Sanjay Kakati, the authorized signatory of the applicant dated 23.02.2016 has been filed in support of the motion. The affidavit explains the reasons for not removing office objections within time and consequent delay in filing this motion.

Learned AGP Mr. Takke has no objection for the motion being allowed.

Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Time of four weeks is granted to remove the office objections.

Needless to state that if office objections are not removed within the stipulated period of four weeks from today, the writ petition itself will stand dismissed without reference of the Court.

(RIYAZ IQBAL CHAGLA,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) .....

Borey 2/2