← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMS/306/2017consent term

Viant Pte. Ltd. v. Arshiya Limited And 2 ORS

2017-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

1/2 904.NMCD-359-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.306 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.359 OF 2017 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.306 OF 2017 Viant Pte. Ltd.

....Plaintiff Vs.

Arshiya Limited and Ors.

....Defendants ---- Mr. Aniketh Nair i/b. Mustafa Motiwala for plaintiff. Mr. Gajendra H. Golchha, constituted attorney of plaintiff. Mr. Kersi Dostoor i/b. Phoenix Legal for defendant nos.1 and 2. Mr. Navnit Choudhary, constituted attorney of defendant nos.1 and 2 present.

Mr. Aditya N. Raut i/b. Desai Desai Currimjee and Mulla for defendant no.3.

Mr. Shivkumar Pasi, authorised signatory of defendant no.3 present. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2017 P.C.:

Parties have entered into consent terms dated 26th September, 2017. The consent terms signed by the constituted attorney of plaintiff, constituted attorney of defendant no.1 and authorised signatory of defendant no.3 and their respective Advocates is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. It is also stated that defendant no.2 is not a legal entity.

Order in terms of the consent terms. All undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted and so ordered. Gauri Gaekwad

2/2 904.NMCD-359-2017.doc Suit accordingly stands disposed in terms of the consent terms. Refund, if any, of court fees in accordance with rules. All interim applications stand disposed and interim order, if any also stands vacated. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad