Smt. Sushila Baban Pawar 63 ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And 4 ORS.

48(2)-WP.1148.2014.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1148 OF 2014 Smt. Sushila Baban Pawar } and Ors.

} Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. S. G. Surana i/b. Mr. Madhur Surana for the petitioners.

Ms. Uma Palsuledesai - AGP for respondent no. 1.

Mr. Vijay D. Patil for respondent no. 2.

Mr. R. K. Dubey i/b. Mr. R. P. Ojha for respondent no. 4.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & A. A. SAYED, JJ.

DATED :- MARCH 9, 2016 P.C. :- After hearing Mr. Surana appearing for the petitioners, we do not find any reason to entertain this writ petition. The challenge to the order of the High Power Committee dated 12th February, 2014 is purely academic. No scheme for rehabilitation is presently on record. Therefore, the authority is at liberty to take appropriate steps and in accordance with law. If the petitioners have opportunity in law to present a scheme, then, J.V.Salunke,PA

48(2)-WP.1148.2014.doc the same can be presented irrespective of the dismissal of the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA