← Library
Bombay High CourtCARBP/5/2021consent term

Rajesh Shantilal Sanghvi v. Sharad Jayantilal Mehta And ANR

2022-07-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni2 pages

Digitally signed by PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK Date:

2022.07.16 11:24:22 +0530 PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK 901-carbp 5-21 Prajakta Vartak

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 5 OF 2021 Rajesh Shantilal Sanghvi

...Petitioner

Vs.

Sharad Jayantilal Mehta & Anr.

...Respondents

----- Mr. Viral Thaker i/b. Mr. Mahesh Thaker for Petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Maurya i/b. Kavita Vishwakarma for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Sharad Mehta, Respondent No.1 present.

----- CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : JULY 14, 2022.

P.C.:

1.

Respondent no.1 is stated to be present in the Court. It is stated by Mr. Maurya, learned counsel that vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 would be filed in the office within a week from today. Statement is accepted.

2.

Learned counsel for the parties have tendered Consent Order (Consent Terms) which states that award dated 27 February, 2020 passed by the learned sole arbitrator, subject matter of the present petition, stands set aside. Parties have also confirmed that they have no claim against each other. They have also withdrawn all allegations as made against each other. The consent order is signed by the petitioner Mr. Rajesh Shantilal Sanghvi, respondent no.1 Mr. Sharad Jayantilal Mehta and respondent no.2 Mrs.Manisha Sharad Mehta. Learned advocates for the respective parties have also signed the consent order. There is no dispute in regard to the signatures appearing on the consent order. The consent order is accordingly taken on record and marked "X"

901-carbp 5-21 for identification.

3.

The petition is disposed of in terms of the consent order. No costs. 4.

Refund of Court Fees as per rules.

[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]