Suvarnsingh Goud And 4 ORS v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And 2 ORS

Before : Shri A. M. Chandekar Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 28th March, 2018 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL (ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS) : CHOL/279/2018 WPL/2834/2017 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Mr. Goud Satish Kuversing, Advocate for Applicants.

Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advocate for Respondents.

P.C. :

Instant Chamber Order is taken out for setting aside Order dated 23.01.2018, rejecting Petition for non-removal of office objections.

Ld. Counsel for Applicants filed Affidavit of Service, which is taken on file.

Perused Affidavit in Support. Heard Ld.

Counsels for both parties. Affidavit in Support reveals that Petitioners could not remove office objections due to certain personal difficulties. Petitioners were not aware about passing of Order.

Ld. Counsel for Respondents submits to the order of this office.

As reason mentioned in the Affidavit in Support appears to be sufficient, Chamber Order is granted as prayed and signed separately.

Applicants and/or their Advocate to remove office objections on the Petition and get the same numbered and regd.

on or before 11-04-2018, failing Petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986.

Date : 28.03.2018 Prothonotary & Senior Master