Deepak Matai And ANR v. Sunder Shahani

901-RTPL3-17+.DOC Atul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 3 OF 2017 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 36 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 69 OF 2017 Deepak Matai & Anr

...Petitioners

Versus

Sunder Shahani

...Respondent

Mr VY Sanglikar, with Mrunalini Panchal, i/b MRK Law Associates, for the Petitioners.

Mr Tejas Vora, i/b Bina S Shivhare, for the Respondent. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

20th June 2017 PC:- 1.

The delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. 2.

The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly. 3.

There is no reason for review of order and judgment dated 25th October 2016. No ground is made out within the meaning of Section 114 or Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 20th June 2017

901-RTPL3-17+.DOC 4.

The Review Petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 20th June 2017