Sps Multi-Commodity Pvt. Ltd. v. -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 267 OF 2015. In the matter of the Companies Act I of 1956.
AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
AND In the matter of the Scheme of Amalgamation of :
SPS Capital & Money Management Services Private Limited WITH SPS Multi Commodity Private Limited AND their Respective Shareholders SPS Multi-Commodity Private Limited, ) a Company incorporated under the Companies ) Act, 1956 and having its Registered Office at ) 66, Tamarind Lane, 4/5, Haji Kasa Building, ) 1st Floor, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 )....Applicant Company Called Summons for Direction for hearing Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b Rajesh Shah & Co, Advocates for the Applicant Company.
CORAM: S. J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 27TH MARCH, 2015 MINUTES OF ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company above named by a Summons for Direction AND UPON HEARING Mr. Rajesh Shah instructed by M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocates for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 2nd day of March, 2015 of Mr. Milan Marathe, Authorised Signatory of the Applicant Company, in support of Company Summons for Direction and the Exhibits referred to therein, IT IS ORDERED THAT:-
1. The convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, for the purpose of considering, and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s), the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation of SPS Capital & Money Management Services Private Limited with SPS Multi Commodity Private Limited and their respective shareholders, is dispensed with in view of the consent given by both the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company which are annexed as Exhibits "G-1" and "G-2" to the Affidavit in Support of Company Summons for Direction.
2. That there are no Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as stated in paragraph 19 of the Affidavit in Support of Company Summons for Direction. Hence, the question of convening and holding meeting of Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company does not arise.
(S. J. KATHAWALLA , J)