← Library
Bombay High CourtAPP/566/2014

Sahjun Impex Trading Pvt. Ltd. v. The Officil Liquidator H.C.Bombay Of Patheja Forgings And Auto Parts Manufacturers Ltd. And 23 ORS.

2015-02-06Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade2 pages

APP. 566-14 VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL No. 566 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1156 OF 2010 IN SUIT No. 13 OF 2010 Sahjun Impex Trading Pvt. Ltd.

...

Appellant Vs.

The Official Liquidator of Patheja Forgings & Auto Parts Manufacturers Ltd. (In Liqn.) & Ors.

...

Respondents *** Mr. Zubin Behramkamdin a/w Niranjan Amit & Prerak Sharma i/b B. Amin & Co., for the Appellant.

Mr. Snehal Shah a/w M/s. Geetanjali Joshi i/b Doijodi Associates, for Respondent No. 7.

Mr. Monil Punjabi i/b Apex Law Partners, for Respondent No. 11. *** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 6, 2015 PC.

1.

The Appellant is challenging the order dated 23rd December, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing the Notice of Motion No. 1156 of 2010 on the ground that motion is not served on the Respondents. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that the Respondent Nos. 22 and 23 (who were 1 / 2

APP. 566-14 the only Respondents in the motion) were, in fact, served, and therefore, the observation made by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order is not correct.

2.

Perused the impugned order. The Appellant has served the Respondents, none appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 22 and 23, though they are served. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant undertakes to file affidavit of service within one week. 3.

It appears that the said observation made by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order is not correct since in the notice of motion reply was filed by Respondent Nos. 22 and 23 and a rejoinder thereto was filed by the Appellant herein. In view of this, the impugned order dated 23rd December, 2013 is set aside and Notice of Motion No. 1156 of 2010 is restored to the file. Appeal is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.] Vinayak Halemath 2 / 2