← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/986/2018consent term

Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply And Transport Undertaking And ANR. v. Mumbai Electric Workers Union

2018-08-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte1 pages

Chittewan 1/1 903a. WP 986-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.986 OF 2018 Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking And Another ...

Petitioners

Versus

The BEST Workers Union ...

Respondent .....

Mr. S.K. Talsania, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Kavita Anchan i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for the Petitioners.

Ms. Neeta Karnik for the Respondent.

Mr. V.S. Gaikwad, General Secretary for the Respondent present. .....

CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.

DATE : 10 AUGUST 2018 P.C. :

.

Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and also by the advocates (learned Counsel for the Respondent submitting that an NoC has been obtained from earlier advocate and vakalatnama would be duly filed on behalf of the Respondent). Mr. V.S. Gaikwad, General Secretary of the Respondent-union, who is present in court, has signed the consent terms. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the petition in terms of the consent terms. Consent terms are taken on record, marked 'X' for identification. Statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs.

(S.C. GUPTE, J.) by Rajesh Vasant Chittewan Date:

2018.08.14 17:02:16 +0530 Rajesh Vasant Chittewan