Mahindra And Mahindra Limited v. G. Mahindra

914-NMSL-865-2016.DOC JSN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.865 OF 2016 IN SUIT (L) NO.228 OF 2016 Mahindra & Mahindra Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

G. Mahindra ... Defendant Mr. Raj Rao, i/b Banatwala Plaintiff.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

1st July 2016 PC:- 1.

Pursuant to the order dated 6th May 2016, the Plaintiff has now effected substituted service on the Defendant. The necessary notices have been published in English, Telugu, Tamil and Kannada in seven different newspapers in various territories in South India. This is sufficient. No Plaintiff can be expected to do more. 2.

The Defendant is absent though served. There was an adinterim order dated 16th March 2016. 3.

Now that service is effected, and since I have separately granted leave under Clause XIV of the Letters Patent today, the 1 July 2016

914-NMSL-865-2016.DOC Notice of Motion can be taken up for final hearing and for further reliefs in addition to those granted earlier. 4.

The previous order of 16th March 2016 granted relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c). That order will continue as the final order in the Notice of Motion. In addition, there will also be an order in terms of prayer clause (b).

5.

The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). No costs.

(G. S. PATEL, J.) 1 July 2016