Sharad Nivrutti Khokrale v. The Official Liquidator, Indage Vinters Ltd. (In Prov. Liqn.)

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2020 Vijay Vittal Darekar ....Applicant In the matter between Subline Agro Ltd.

....Petitioner V/s.

The Official Liquidator M/s Indage Vinterns Ltd.

.....Respondent INTERIM APPLICATION NO.394 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.399 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.400 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.401 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.403 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.405 OF 2020

2/3 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.407 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.495 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.499 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.501 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.502 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.509 OF 2020 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.510 OF 2020

3/3 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.511 OF 2020 Ms. Namrata N. Shenoy for Applicant (in all applications); Mr. Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator. CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATED : 23rd NOVEMBER 2020 P.C. :

Considered the applications and reasons for the delay. Each of the applicant is a workman and the claim is for non payment of salary. Mr. Aithe also states that the delay can be condoned and the Official Liquidator will consider the affidavit of proof of debts in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by Mr. Aithe, all the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). All the applications accordingly stand disposed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, J) Meera M.

Jadhav by Meera M.

Jadhav Date: 2020.11.23 19:27:32 +0530