Damodar Narayan Suryawanshi v. Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority Mumbai(Mhada) Throug President And 3 ORS

Shubhada S Kadam 6 WPL 6883.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

O.O.C.J.

WRIT PETITION LODGING NO. 6883 OF 2021 Shri Damodar Narayan Suryawanshi ....Petitioner versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, Mumbai and ors.

.....Respondents Mr. R. S. Apte, senior advocate with Mr. Ketan Dhavle and Ms. Dhanashree Bhate, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tejas D. Deshmukh, advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, AGP For the State.

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & N. R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

P.C.:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner, who is present with him, seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Government by submitting necessary representation. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn.

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2021.09.16 10:33:16 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 6 WPL 6883.2021.doc 2.

In the event, representation as referred above is filed by the petitioner before the Government, the State Government may consider the same independently on its own merits and decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

( N. R. BORKAR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) 2/2