M/S. Heat Shrink Technologies Ltd. v. Union Of India And 2 ORS.

amol 28.wp.1114.2007.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 442 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2007 M/S. Heat Shrink Technologies

...Petitioner

Vs.

Union Of India And 2 Ors.

... Respondents __________ None for the Petitioner.

Mr. Swapnil Bangar a/w. Siddharth Chadrashekhar for the Respondents. __________ CORAM :

G. S. KULKARNI & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

JUNE 09, 2023 P.C.:

1.

None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called out. Hence, the matter was kept back. If the Petitioner on the second call is not represented, it would be required to be presumed that the Petitioner is not interested to prosecute this Petition and the Petition would be required to be dismissed for want of prosecution.

2.

Even in the second session when the matter is called out, none appears for the Petitioner. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] [G. S. KULKARNI, J.] ------------------------- 09 June, 2023