Saramma Varghese v. Board Of Directors Of Vijaya Bank And 12 ORS.

1 /2 WP-3031-2014 & ors. Nalawade

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3031 OF 2014 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.418 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3031 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1325 OF 2016 AND NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.77 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1325 OF 2016 ...............

Mrs. Saramma Varghese

...Petitioner.

vs.

The Board of Directors of Vijaya Bank and ors.

...Respondents.

.................

Mr. Mathews J. Nedumpara with Mrs. Rohini Amin for the petitioner in both the writ petitions and for the applicant in both the notice of motions.

Mr. Madhur Rai with Mr. Dharma Raj i/by PRS Legal for Respondent No.6 in both the petitions.

Mrs. Veena Thadani for Respondent Nos.11,12 and 13 in W.P. No.3031/2014 and for Respondent Nos. 24, 25 and 27 in W.P. No.1325 of 2016.

CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 06th February, 2017 PC:

It is observed in order passed by this Court that S.A. Lodging No.563 of 2013 presented by the petitioner is

2 /2 WP-3031-2014 & ors. pending before the DRT-I, Pune. The Division Bench of this Court dealing with several contentions in Notice of Motion No.287 of 2016 presented in W.P. No.3031/2014 and other companion notice of motions in writ petitions and various other numbers mentioned in the order dated 29.4.2016 has dealt with the issue at the stage of decision of the notice of motions in detailed. Counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that he would like to pursue the remedies before the DRT and therefore petitioner is granted liberty to place all the contentions before the DRT. It would be open to the petitioner to pursue the remedy already availed of i.e. S.A.(L) No.563 of 2013 pending before the DRT. It would be open for the petitioner to put forth his grievances and urge all the contentions before the DRT. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petitions are disposed off.

2.

It would be open to the petitioner to implead the auction purchaser as party respondent, since no steps have been reportedly taken in that regard yet.

3.

In view of the above, all the notice of motions stand disposed off.

(A.S.GADKARI, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)