← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/825/2020disposed off

Annika Madgavkar Lobo v. Ifin Commodities Limited And 2 ORS

2021-03-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Virendrasingh Gyansingh Bisht3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 821 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2021 Celsa A. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 823 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2021 Ayesha A. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 820 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2021 Aakash A. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2021 Anil V. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents 1/3

ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 824 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2021 Nisha A. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 822 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2021 Nadisha A. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 825 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2021 Annika Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ALONG WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 828 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2021 Annand V. Madgavkar ... Applicant

Versus

IFIN Commodities Limited and Ors.

... Respondents ......

2/3

Mr. Ashwin Shanker a/w.Mr. Bimal Rajasekhar and Mr. Rishi Murarka for the Applicant in all Applications. Mr. Charles D'

souza a/w. Mr. Nikhil Rajani, Ms. Jyoti Sanap i/by M/s. V. Deshpande and Co. for the Respondents in all Applications. ......

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & V.G.BISHT, JJ.

DATE : 22nd March, 2021 P.C.:

1.

The learned Counsel for the parties are ad-idem that all these appeals have been filed within the time prescribed and there is no delay in filing these appeals.

2.

We are thus not required to go into the issue whether there was any delay in filing these appeals or not. 3.

Interim Applications are accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.

(V.G.BISHT, J.) (R.D.DHANUKA, J.) 3/3