← Library
Bombay High CourtNMA/291/2018

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Bharti Retail Limited(Now Known As Future Retail Ltd)

2018-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha2 pages

Uday S. Jagtap 291-18-NMA-40=.doc THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 291 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2934 OF 2017 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2934 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 .. Applicant In the matter between Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 .. Appellant V/s.

M/s. Bharti Retail Ltd.

.. Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Vipul Joshi for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.

DATED : 26th JULY, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This Notice of Motion has been taken out in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2934 of 2017. The appeal is not on board. At the request of the parties, the appeal is taken up for consideration along with this Notice of Motion. This for the reason that Mr. Tejveer Singh under instructions of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-9(3)(2) seeks to withdraw the appeal as well as Notice of Motion filed in the appeal. 2.

This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2010-11. Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.07.27 14:13:57 +0530 Uday Shivaji Jagtap

Uday S. Jagtap 291-18-NMA-40=.doc 2.

Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue invited our attention to Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax (CBDT). The above Circular directs the Officers of the Revenue not to file appeals to the High Court where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs. It also directs its Officers to withdraw / not press its pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fall in the excluded class of appeals listed therein. 3.

Our attention is invited to para 10 of the Appeal Memo, which indicates that in this Appeal, the tax effect is Rs 47.39 lakhs. 4.

In view of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the CBDT, Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, on instructions, does not press the present Appeal. 5.

Accordingly, Appeal and the motion are dismissed, as not pressed.

6.

Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)