A.F.Pinto And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

(229) WP 1614-98 Amk

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1614 OF 1998 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Courts orders or Court's or Judge's orders directions & Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the Petitioner.

None for the Respondent.

Ms. G. R. Shastri, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the State.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI. A. NAIK AND MR. RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE : 8 th DECEMBER, 2017.

P. C. :

It appears from the office note that though sincere efforts for tracing out the record and proceedings were made, the record and proceedings in the writ petition are not traced. In the aforesaid set of facts, neither the papers of the petitioners are available nor is the address of the petitioners available. It would not be possible in the aforesaid set of facts to either reconstruct the record or serve the petitioners. The petitioners ought to have taken some steps for securing the knowledge about the progress of the matter that is pending in this Court since 1998. Hence, in the circumstances of the case, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. [RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.] [SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J.] 1/1