Rajan Verma v. Kawaldeep Verma And ANR

2-SL-494-16.doc Chaitali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 494 OF 2016 ALONGWITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 744 OF 2017 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1685 OF 2016 Rajan Verma ...Plaintiff

Versus

Kawaldeep Verma & Anr.

...Defendants ---------- Pushpvijay Kanoji i/b Siddhesh Bhole for Plaintiff. ---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J DATE :

18TH NOVEMBER, 2022 ORDER :

1.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff has sought leave to withdraw Suit No. 494 of 2016 on the ground that the matter has been settled.

2.

In view thereof, Suit No. 494 of 2016 is disposed of as withdrawn.

1/2

2-SL-494-16.doc 3.

In view of the withdrawal of the Suit, the pending Interim Applications do not survive and are accordingly disposed of. 4.

Court fees are to be refunded in accordance with the Rules. For the purposes of Section 43 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act and the proviso to that Section, today's date is the date of making a claim for repayment. The Prothonotary & Senior Master will issue a certificate for a refund of Court Fees computed according to the Rules. He will act on production of an authenticated copy of this order without requiring a separate application.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.] 2/2